Werfel v. Agresta
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The Appellate Division was correct in concluding that, in a full-fledged judicial proceeding, it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction and that, moreover, the petition fails to state a claim for relief under CPLR article 78.
The assignment and compensation of counsel in criminal matters under sections 722 and 722-b of the County Law, and the plans adopted pursuant to statute do not, for purposes of review, fall within either civil or criminal proceedings as the practice statutes are structured. Fixing compensation for assigned counsel pursuant to the statute is one of numerous responsibilities of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Fisher v. SchenckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Matter of Snitkin v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- People v. DiehlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
3Cited by40 opinions
- Matter of Dir.(bodek)New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Levenson v. LippmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. BrismanNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- Kraham v. MathewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.