Legal Opinion

Goehler v. Cortland County

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 25, 2009PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mercure, J.P.

Plaintiffs are attorneys who are on the Cortland County assigned counsel panel and have accepted appointments to represent indigent clients in the Family, County and Surrogate’s Courts of Cortland County. They commenced this action seeking to have Local Law No. 1 (2006) of the County of Cortland declared invalid on the ground that it violates County Law § 722 and the Municipal Home Rule Law. As relevant here, Local Law No. 1 created the office of conflict attorney and set forth a new *59procedure for the assignment of counsel for indigent litigants. The procedure…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holtzman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People Ex Rel. Williams v. La ValleeNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Matter of Dir.(bodek)New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Stream v. BeisheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  5. Pompa v. Burroughs Wellcome Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. New York County Lawyers' Ass'n v. BloombergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Roulan v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Smith v. TormeyNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. New York County Lawyers' Ass'n v. BloombergNew York Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Smith v. TormeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API