Bliven v. Hunt
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEUERSTEIN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
On October 17, 2005, pro se plaintiff David Bliven (“Plaintiff’ or “Bliven”), an attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York, commenced this action pursuant to, inter alia, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. Defendant City of New York (“Defendant” or “the City”) now moves for dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted.
II. Plaintiffs Pleadings
Although Plaintiff proceeds pro se he is an experienced attorney and accordingly his pleading is not entitled to the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McMillian v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- James Walker v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bliven v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Brian King v. The City of Crestwood, MOCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Dellutri v. Village of ElmsfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Walker ex rel. T.W. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Singletary v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.