Legal Opinion
Matter of Dir.(bodek)
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 1995PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
In Matter of Werfel v Agresta (36 NY2d 624), this Court held that an order issued pursuant to County Law §§ 722 and 722-b regarding an assigned criminal defense attorney’s compensation is not subject to appellate review. This appeal requires us to consider the appealability and reviewability of compensation orders issued pursuant to County Law § 722-c.
The dispute arises out of services that were rendered by respondent Hillel Bodek, a certified social worker, in connection with several criminal cases that were pending before the Supreme Court in New York County. In each…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Hynes v. KarassikNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Mtr. of Abrams (John Anonymous)New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Cunningham v. NadjariNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Santangello v. PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- District Attroney v. Angelo G.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by26 opinions
- Goehler v. Cortland CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Levenson v. LippmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. PurleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. BrismanNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- Kraham v. MathewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.