Legal Opinion

State v. Montez

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 2017No. A16-1071Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOLLY, Judge

Appellant, having failed to comply with the conditions of his plea agreement and been sentenced without regard to the plea agreement, argues that his sentence violates the plea agreement and entitles him to withdraw his plea. Because a district court has no obligation to impose the sentence in a plea agreement on a defendant who has failed to comply with the conditions in .that agreement, we affirm.

FACTS

In May 2015, appellant Andrew Montez sold a pound of marijuana for $2,500 to a confidential informant in Washington County. He was charged with fifth-degree controlled…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RaleighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. State v. KortkampCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. State v. KunshierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API