Legal Opinion

State v. Rhodes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 2004No. C7-03-80PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

We are asked to extend the holding in State v. Wukawitz, 662 N.W.2d 517, 520 (Minn.2003), to allow a defendant to withdraw his guilty plea or the court to modify *325the sentence where a mandatory conditional release term is not included in the maximum executed sentence described in the defendant’s plea petition but the defendant is on notice of the state’s intention to seek the term before sentencing and fails to object to its inclusion in the sentence. The court of appeals applied Wukawitz to hold that the plea was not intelligently entered and the sentence must be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Kochevar v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. State v. HumesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. RaleighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. James v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. State v. ByronCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Robel Belay Kubrom v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API