Legal Opinion
State v. Kortkamp
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 18, 1997No. C3-96-993PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
In this appeal from a conviction following a plea of guilty to one count of offering a forged check, appellant alleges that the trial court erred in failing to permit him to withdraw his plea. Appellant also challenges his sentence as a career offender pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 609.152, subd. 3, and alleges lack of notice of the state’s planned use of uncharged conduct to establish career offender status. Because we agree that (1) appellant was entitled to withdraw his plea and (2) appellant should have been given notice of the intended use of uncharged conduct, we…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gray v. NetherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. GormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vickla v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Martinek v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- In re S.L.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Vickla v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re SlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.