Stroehmann Bros. Co. v. Manbeck B. Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Drew,
This suit in equity was brought to restrain defendant from alleged trade-mark infringement and unfair competition, and to compel an accounting of profits allegedly gained thereby. Upon finding that neither infringement nor unfair competition existed, the court below dismissed the bill. This appeal followed.
We agree that plaintiff has shown nothing to justify the interference of equity. To make a case of unfair competition it must be shown by the person complaining that another by simulation of labels (Klepser v. Furry, 289 Pa. 152; Juan F. Portuondo Cigar Mfg. Co.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Juan F. Portuondo Cigar Manufacturing Co. v. Vicente Portuondo Cigar Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- B. V. D. Co. v. Kaufmann & Baer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Philadelphia Dairy Products v. Quaker City Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- United Drug Co. v. KovacsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Heinz v. Lutz Bros., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Campbell Soup Co. v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- John Wright, Inc. v. Casper Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Pennsylvania State University v. University Orthopedics, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Peters v. MacHikasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.