Legal Opinion

Peters v. MacHikas

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 2, 1954No. Appeal, 250PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Bell,

Platon P'eters, an individual trading under the fictitious name of “Majestic Restaurant” which is located at 2442 Kensington Avenue, Philadelphia, filed a complaint in equity to restrain defendants, who are also engaged in the restaurant business at 3171 Kensington Avenue, Philadelphia, from using the trade name of “Majestic Grille”. Defendants’ restaurant is on the same street as plaintiff’s, approximately 7 blocks away.

We summarize the Chancellor’s findings:

In 1924 plaintiff, defendant Machikas, and George Anagnastou formed a partnership to operate a restaurant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Noonan EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. American Clay Manufacturing Co. v. American Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Kalyvas v. KalyvasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Kelly v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Eways v. Reading Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. De Joseph v. ZambelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Wortex Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Foulke v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API