Legal Opinion

Adams v. Public Employees Retirement Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 13, 2002No. 99-0389; A111942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Petitioners, who worked as mental health therapists at the Oregon State Hospital (OSH), seek judicial review of a final order of the Public Employees Retirement Board (Board) that concluded that petitioners were not “police officers” for purposes of Public Employee Retirement System (PERS) classifications. They raise a panoply of statutory construction, substantial evidence, and constitutional challenges. We reject those arguments — including petitioners’ contention that they were employed as members of a “law enforcement unit” for purposes of the definition of “police officers.” See ORS…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences UniversityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. In Re the Marriage of CrockerOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Knapp v. City of North BendOregon Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weber v. Oakridge School District 76Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Harmon v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Sulliger v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Darling v. Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Northwest Success, Inc. v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API