In Re the Marriage of Crocker
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
The issue in this domestic relations case is whether a court may order a divorced parent to provide support for his or her child between 18 and 21 years of age attending school. Father maintains that ORS 107.108(1), 1 the statute that permits such an order, is unconstitutional under Article I, section 20, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 2 The trial court held that the statute is unconstitutional on both grounds. The Court of Appeals reversed. Crocker and Crocker, 157 Or App 651, 971 P2d 469 (1998). For…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Krieger v. JustOregon Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mastriano v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Jensen v. WhitlowOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. BrineyOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- G.A.S.P. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.