Legal Opinion
Sulliger v. Lane County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 5, 2003No. 16-00-08839; A116433PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*361EDMONDS, P. J.
Plaintiff is a former employee of defendant. He alleges that defendant was unjustly enriched when it failed to report to the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) that plaintiff was a police officer, thus reducing the retirement contributions that defendant had to make on his behalf. He seeks to recover the amount of the alleged unjust enrichment. The trial court granted defendant’s ORCP 21 motion to dismiss on the grounds that it did not have jurisdiction over the dispute and that plaintiffs allegations do not bring him within the statutory definition of a police officer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Granewich v. HardingOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of ForestryOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Koch v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Lone Oak Racing v. Oregon Racing Com'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Adams v. Public Employees Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wallace v. STATE EX REL. PERBCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Hood River Valley Residents' Committee, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Wallace v. State ex rel. Public Employees Retirement Board & Public Employees Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Sulliger v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003