Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences University
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
At issue in this case is the lawfulness of Oregon Health Science University’s (OHSU) denial of health and life insurance benefits to the unmarried domestic partners of its homosexual employees. Plaintiffs, who are three lesbian employees of OHSU and their domestic partners, initiated this action for judicial review of State Employees’ Benefits Board (SEBB) orders affirming the lawfulness of the denial and for declaratory and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs contend that OHSU’s actions violate ORS 659.030(l)(b), which prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of the sex of an employee…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. BettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Dawson v. Entek InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Conaway v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.