Legal Opinion

Sorrells v. M.Y.B. Hospitality Ventures

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 1993No. 61A93PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The issue before us in this case is whether it was reasonably foreseeable that the plaintiffs would suffer severe emotional distress upon learning that their son had been killed in a one-car accident after he was negligently served alcohol at the defendant’s place of business. We hold that it was not reasonably foreseeable; therefore, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

As this case was dismissed prior to trial pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6), we must treat the allegations of the complaint *671as true. See Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics and Gynecology…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Bailey v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Chappell v. . EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Clohessy v. BachelorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Marzolf v. StoneWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hegel v. McMahonWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Andersen v. BaccusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Sinning v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API