Legal Opinion

Mansfield v. First National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1893No. 540PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whateom County.

1Opinion of the Court

*666The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

On the 6th of January, 1891, the firm of Burrows & Anderson borrowed $1,000 from the First National Bank of Whatcom, to secure the payment of which they gave the bank their note due in sixty days. On March 10th they gave a renewal of the note, and on May 12th a second renewal note. The last named note would not have been due until July 14th. On May 23d, ascertaining that they were insolvent, they conferred with the bank officials and informed them of their condition, and that it would probably be necessary for them to make an assignment at an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Patten v. BurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  2. Traders' Bank v. Van WagenenWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Dawson v. SimsOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Prouty v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. Schaller v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Keyes v. SabinWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Bradley Engineering & Machinery Co. v. MuzzyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. City of Seattle v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Thygesen v. NeufelderWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Thompson v. SinesWashington Supreme Court · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API