Legal Opinion

Traders' Bank v. Van Wagenen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1891No. 145PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

— This is a suit in equity in the nature of a creditors’ bill, brought by the plaintiffs in error in their own behalf against the defendants to obtain relief by having various conveyances, executed by the individual defendants E. D. Yan Wagenen, C. E. Sackett, and William Page to their wives, set aside, canceled, and decreed to be fraudulent and void as against creditors. To this bill certain of the defendants, among them E. D. Yan Wagenen and wife, C. E. Sackett and wife, and William Page and wife, demurred. It appears by the bill of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hahn v. SalmonUnited States Circuit Court · 1884
  2. Sanborn v. CreditorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Thomas v. Hilton, Washington Territory1888

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hatcher v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1826
  2. Mansfield v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Peck Colorado Co. v. StrattonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1899
  4. Thygesen v. NeufelderWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Thompson v. SinesWashington Supreme Court · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API