Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Clark

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1902No. 4333PublishedCited by 9 opinions

' Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Arthur. E. Grieeih, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

White, J.

— This is an action brought by the appellant for the purpose of recovering, from the respondent the sum of $304.69, claimed to be due as. the increased license rate for the sale of intoxicating liquors at retail in accordance with, the provisions, of an amendment to thei city charter of Seattle passed at the general election in March, 1902. Prior to said election the license fee for retail liquor licenses in said city was fixed by. ordinance at $600 per- annum. The freeholders’ charter of the city of Seattle, in addition to the laws for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Mansfield v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State v. Carbon Hill Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Yelle v. BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. Port of Seattle v. Department of Public ServiceWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Southern Pac. Co. v. BartineU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1909
  4. Hartig v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Bradley Engineering & Machinery Co. v. MuzzyWashington Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API