Legal Opinion

Thygesen v. Neufelder

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1894No. 1260PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, J.

— Christian Thygesen made a deed of assignment under the provisions of the insolvency act of March 6, 1890 (Laws, p. 88). The assignee named therein having failed to qualify, the appellant was, in pursuance of the provisions of the statute, appointed assignee and qualified and entered upon the discharge of his duties as such. As a part of the assets of the estate he collected certain moneys due upon a lease, which before the execution of the deed of assignment had been made by said Christian Thygesen to one Brown and one Carter. Thereafter said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oregon Improvement Co. v. SagmeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Abbott v. WetherbyWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Calhoun v. LearyWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Traders' Bank v. Van WagenenWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Mansfield v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Halvorsen v. Pacific CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Gibbons v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  4. Meltzer v. Wendell-WestCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. Davidson v. ClickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API