Legal Opinion

J. R. Simplot Co. v. Department of Agriculture

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2006No. ODA 2000-1; CA A118024; SC S52081PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.

Petitioner J. R. Simplot Company (Simplot) seeks judicial review of an order of the Oregon Department of Agriculture (department), which denied a refund of inspection fees that Simplot had paid to the department. The Court of Appeals affirmed that order, holding that ORS 293.445(2) contains a three-year limitations period that had expired and thus barred the department from providing Simplot a refund. We affirm the Court of Appeals, but we do so on different grounds.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Simplot’s primary complaint is that the department overcharged it for inspecting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Coast Security Mortgage Corp. v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. COST SECURITY v. Real Estate AgencyOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. J. R. Simplot Co. v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Karjalainen v. Curtis Johnston & Pennywise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Penn v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API