Legal Opinion

Jones v. Minick

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1998No. 02A04-9801-CV-12PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Plaintiffs-Appellants Caroline and Cody Jones (collectively “the Joneses”) appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Linus Minick, M.D. (“Dr. Minick”) following the Joneses’ complaint alleging medical malpractice.

We reverse.

ISSUE

One issue is dispositive of this appeal: Whether the Joneses presented evidence sufficient to rebut the opinion of the medical review panel and thus to overcome summary judgment.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

During the time pertinent to this case, Dr. Minick maintained a medical practice in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Havert v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Oelling v. RaoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Jordan v. DeeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Henshilwood v. Hendricks CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. City of Elkhart v. Agenda: Open Government, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chi Yun Ho v. FryeIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. McIntosh v. CumminsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Kevin T. Scripture, M.D., Richard Mangan, O.D., Judy D. Risch, O.D., and Whitewater Eye Centers, LLC v. Julia and Steven RobertsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Aldrich v. CodaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Hassan v. BegleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API