Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Cummins

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 2001No. 49A04-0107-CV-290PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

Dr. Brent R. Melntosh ("Dr. Meln-tosh"), an orthopedic surgeon, appeals the trial court's order denying his motion for summary judgment. Dr. Melntosh raises the following issue for our review: whether the trial court erred in finding a genuine issue of material fact in a motion for summary judgment supported by a favorable medical review panel opinion and opposed only by the testimony of a family practitioner.

We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

The facts most favorable to the judgment reveal that in October 1992, Joe Cummins ("Cummins") fractured his right femur and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oelling v. RaoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Vergara Ex Rel. Vergara v. DoanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bunch v. TiwariIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Hoskins v. SharpIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Lusk v. SwansonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chi Yun Ho v. FryeIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Mills v. BerriosIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Perry v. DriehorstIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Cummins v. McIntoshIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Jamie Thomson v. Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center and Michael Borkowski, M.D.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API