Legal Opinion

Chi Yun Ho v. Frye

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2008No. 67S01-0707-CV-291PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

In this medical negligence case arising from the alleged failure to remove all of the surgical sponges following abdominal surgery, the trial court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the surgeon, and the trial court thereafter granted a new trial. The Court of Appeals reversed the denial of partial summary judgment, found for the plaintiffs on liability as a matter of law, and remanded for a determination of damages. Ho v. Frye, 865 N.E.2d 632 (Ind.Ct.App.2007). We granted transfer, thereby automatically…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Huff v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Burke v. CapelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Smith v. BaxterIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Keith v. MendusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Cinergy Corp. v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services, Ltd.Indiana Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Barnett v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Kathy L. Siner, Personal Representative of the Estate of Geraldine A. Siner v. Kindred Hospital Limited Partnership, d/b/a Kindred Hospital of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Mary Elizabeth Santelli, as Administrator of the Estate of James F. Santelli v. Abu M. Rahmatullah, Individually and d/b/a Super 8 MotelIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Peterson v. PondaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Ob-Gyn Associates of Northern Indiana, P.C. v. RansbottomIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API