Legal Opinion

Burgos v. Areway, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1996No. 69447PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nahra, Judge.

Appellant, Angelo Burgos, is appealing the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of his employer-appellee, Areway, Inc., arising out of appellant’s intentional tort claim. For the following reasons, we affirm.

Areway is in the business of plating and polishing small metal parts. Angelo Burgos had been employed at Areway as a plater for four months. The plating line consists of two parallel rows of tanks separated by a catwalk. The level of the catwalk is below the tanks. The plater stands on the catwalk to operate an electrically controlled hoist that lowers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Sanek v. Duracote Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Cook v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Foust v. Magnum Restaurants, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Kreais v. Chemi-Trol Chemical Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Products Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Holstein v. Ohio Valley Vulcanizing, Inc., 06 Be 41 (6-18-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Huntington National Bank v. KazmaierOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Teal v. Colonial Stair Woodwork Co., Unpublished Decision (11-22-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. U.S. Bank v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API