Legal Opinion

Holstein v. Ohio Valley Vulcanizing, Inc., 06 Be 41 (6-18-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 2007No. 06 BE 41PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} This timely appeal comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court, the parties' briefs, and their oral arguments before this court. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Larry and Roseanne Holstein, appeal the decision of the Belmont County Court of Common Pleas that granted summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee, The Ohio Valley Coal Company, on the Holsteins' claim for an employer intentional tort. In order to survive summary judgment in a claim for an employer intentional tort, the Holsteins must demonstrate, among other things, that there is a genuine issue of material fact…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Byers v. Robinson, 08ap-204 (9-23-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Am. Express Centurian Bank v. BanaieOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. BoswellOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Marzano v. Struthers City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Mahoning County2017
  5. Milligan v. MorellOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API