In Re Estate of Richmond
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, settling the final account of an executor. Peter J. Shields, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order settling the final account of the executor of the above-entitled estate. In his account he recapitulates his credits and debits, .showing;
Credit ................'.......................$24,425.24
Debit ........................................ 22,894.59
Balance due executor from estate..............$ 1,530.65
In its order, restating the account as settled and allowed, the court, on January 22, 1906, the date of the decree, found as follows;
Debit ........................................$24,426.77
Credit ...................................... 8,700.75
Due the estate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Estate of Moore v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Rafferty v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- In re Estate of PackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In re BaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Francis v. BarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Estate of EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Montecito County Water District v. DoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Scott v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.