Legal Opinion

Montecito County Water District v. Doulton

California Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1924No. S. F. No. 11048PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate wherein the Montecito County Water District, a public corporation, seeks to compel the respondent, H. J, Doulton, as president of said district, to sign certain bonds of said district which he has thus far refused to do. The facts out of which this proceeding arose, as set forth in said petition and conceded by the respondent to be truly stated thereunder, are briefly as follows: The Montecito County Water District was duly organized and exists under the provisions of an act of the legislature entitled “An act to provide for the incorporation and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eddy v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Mayne v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Vanderbilt v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State Commission in Lunacy v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Metropolitan Water Dist. v. MarquardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Berg v. TraegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Barber v. GallowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Hopkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API