Rafferty v. Kearney
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco settling the accounts of an executor and directing the payment of a claim against the estate of a deceased person. J. V. Cofiey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
The transcript presents two appeals by the executor; one from an order entered March 23, 1899, settling his third annual account, and the other from an order entered at the same time directing him to pay the claim against the estate of Peter A. Kearney, amounting with interest to $613.
The main question involved in the appeal first above mentioned is whether the court erred in disregarding a former order made November 24, 1897, settling appellant’s second account, and in expressly setting aside said former order and re-' settling the former account and disallowing nearly all the items of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commercial Bank of San Luis Obispo v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- In re Estate of StottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Reynolds v. BrumagimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Tobelman v. HildebrandtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- In re Estate of CoutsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Guardianship of Di CarloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of SimontonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Estate of King v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lazzarone v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.