In re Bane
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Merced County settling the account of a guardian. J. K. Law, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Jacob Gardner, Jr., was duly appointed guardian of the estates of John H. and Edna L. Bane, minors, in March, 1892. There came into his hands as such guardian $2,-722.48. Upon the 18th of March, 1897, he was ordered by the court to render an account of his guardianship, which order was complied with. John H. Bane, having come of age, filed objections to certain items of the account. Upon the hearing the court approved and settled the account as rendered, except as to an item of $25, which was reduced to $20. No finding of fact or conclusions of law were filed or signed by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Estate of CousinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Naltner v. DolanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- In re Estate of ArguelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Estate of WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Elizalde v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Elizalde v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- American Surety Co. of New York v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- In Re Estate of RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.