Legal Opinion
Westley v. Oclaro, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 21, 2012No. C-11-2448 EMCPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a class action against Oclaro, Inc. and two of its officers, Alain Couder and Jerry Turin, for violations of the federal securities laws. In *909essence, Plaintiffs charge Defendants with making false and misleading statements about Oclaro’s customer demand and how Oclaro could be expected to fare for the first quarter of 2011 (“1Q11”) and for the calendar year. See SAC ¶ 1. Currently pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ second amended…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mulligan v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Bodri v. GoPro, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Shenwick v. Twitter, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. LoomisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- In re LeapFrog Enterprise, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.