Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Loomis
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 3, 2013No. 2:10-cv-00458-KJM-KJNPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
This case was on the court’s June 28, 2013 calendar for the motion for summary judgment brought by plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on its claims against defendant Lawrence “Lee” Loomis. Jeremy Pendrey and John Yun appeared for the SEC, and Douglas Beevers appeared for Loomis. For the reasons stated below, the court GRANTS the SEC’s motion.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND UNDISPUTED FACTS
From 2007 to 2008, Loomis controlled Loomis Wealth Solutions (“LWS”), an entity that provided financial planning services to individuals. (Compl. ¶¶…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Galena Biopharma, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. UstianDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Mohebbi v. KhazenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. AlexanderDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. LoomisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.