In re LeapFrog Enterprise, Inc. Securities Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
*991ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs have filed a class action against LeapFrog Enterprises Inc., and two of its officers, John Barbour (“Barbour”) and Raymond L. Arthur (“Arthur”), for violations of federal securities laws. Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“FAC”) focuses on the alleged*992ly false and misleading statements about LeapFrog’s inventory, the. roll out of LeapTV, LeapFrog’s financial guidance, and accounting. For the reasons stated below, the Court…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bodri v. GoPro, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Costabile v. Natus Med. Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Altimeo Asset Management v. Jumei International Holding LimitedDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Perez v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024