Legal Opinion

State v. Gallegos

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2007No. CF050603, CF060154 A132618 (control) A132619PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

In these consolidated cases, defendant was convicted of multiple offenses. His only assignment of error on appeal pertains to the trial court’s imposition of an upward departure sentence on a conviction for second-degree burglary in one of those cases. Specifically, defendant contends that the imposition of a departure sentence based on an aggravating factor — viz., that defendant was “on supervision” at the time he committed his crime — that is not specifically listed in the state sentencing guidelines violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DavillaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. BoitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. SchenewerkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. KurtzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. CarreraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API