Legal Opinion

State v. Bryan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 6, 2008No. CR0500541; A128743PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for three counts of witness tampering. ORS 162.285. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to prove that defendant had tampered with a “witness in an official proceeding” at the time his conduct occurred. We affirm.

The relevant facts are undisputed. Defendant was arrested for sexual abuse; the victim was his girlfriend’s daughter. On December 24, while in custody, defendant telephoned his girlfriend. He told her that the victim was not permitted to play with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. Chang Hwan ChoOregon Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Doe v. Medford School District 549CCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. Orlando Vasquez-Valle v. Jefferson Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. State v. LockamyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. RochaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. AngeloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API