Legal Opinion

State v. Lockamy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 1, 2009No. 051136925; A134243PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant was indicted on one count of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270(1), and one count of possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.840(3)(b). He waived a jury trial and the trial court found him guilty on both counts. On appeal, he assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of acquittal on the felon in possession charge, arguing that the state was required to prove that he knew of his status as a felon and that it failed to do so. We conclude that, even if the state was required to prove that he knew of his status, it did so. We therefore…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. RutleyOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PedersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. O'HaraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Talbott v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. JimenezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API