Legal Opinion

State v. Murray

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2006No. CC 02CR0274; CA A118634; SC S52704PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*601GILLETTE, J.

This is a criminal case in which defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for the offense of kidnapping in the second degree (ORS 163.225, set out post). The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction, although it remanded defendant’s case to the trial court for resentencing. State v. Murray, 200 Or App 732, 117 P3d 297 (2005). We allowed defendant’s petition for review and now reverse his conviction for kidnapping.

We view the facts underlying defendant’s conviction in the light most favorable to the state. See, e.g., State v. Wolleat, 338 Or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. WolleatOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Comcast Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. Gonzalez-ValenzuelaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Jenkins v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2014

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API