State v. Cunningham
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*49VAN HOOMISSEN, J.
This is an automatic and direct review of a judgment of conviction of aggravated murder and sentence of death. See ORS 163.150(l)(g) (providing for automatic and direct review in the Supreme Court); ORAP 12.10 (automatic review in death sentence cases). Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for aggravated murder. In the alternative, he asks this court to vacate his sentence of death. We affirm the judgment of conviction and the sentence of death.
FACTS
The jury found defendant guilty. We therefore view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state. State v.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by207 opinions
- State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1996
202 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.