Legal Opinion
Krondes v. O'Boy
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 4, 1995No. 12682PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.
The defendants, William O’Boy, Sr., and William O’Boy, Jr., appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff1 in the amount of $259,896 on the plaintiff’s complaint of breach of a contract to sell certain real estate. The defendants claim that the trial court (1) improperly denied their motions for directed verdicts because (a) a counteroffer by O’Boy, Sr., was never accepted by the plaintiff and, therefore, there was no contract, (b) there was no agreement as to the identity of the parties to the contract and (c) O’Boy, Jr., could not have formed a contract with James Krondes…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Krawczyk v. StingleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Latham & Associates, Inc. v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- New London Federal Savings Bank v. TucciaroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Strobel v. StrobelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Grasso v. Connecticut Hospice, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Sheridan v. DesmondConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF NEW HAVEN v. DeRocheConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.