Legal Opinion

State v. Bordeaux

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 2010No. COA09-1484PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLEY, Judge.

The State appeals from a trial court order suppressing Defendant's confession and concluding that the confession was made involuntarily. Because the confession was indeed involuntary, we affirm.

On 12 November 2008, a Hardees restaurant in Wilmington, North Carolina was robbed. During the robbery “each victim was kidnapped, robbed of their personal property . . . and . . . stuffed in a cooler until police arrived.” Police officers, arriving in response to the robbery, were able to apprehend suspect Jaqula Banks at the scene. During an interview with police, Banks implicated…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Ashcraft v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. IngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. State v. HammondsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. BordeauxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API