Legal Opinion

Berghuis v. Thompkins

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 1, 2010No. 08-1470PublishedCited by 1,272 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION OF THE COURT

[560 U.S. 373]

2Opinion of the Court · KennedyJustice Kennedy

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, in a habeas corpus proceeding challenging a Michigan conviction for first-degree murder and certain other offenses, ruled that there had been two separate constitutional errors in the trial that led to the jury’s guilty verdict. First, the Court

[560 U.S. 374]

of Appeals determined that a statement by the accused, relied on at trial by the prosecution, had been elicited in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966). Second, it found that failure to ask for an…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1,272 opinions

  1. Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. BriggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Jones v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  5. Travis Clinton Hittson v. GDCP WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014

1,267 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API