Legal Opinion

State v. Hammonds

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 2015No. 15-53PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

*603Tae Kwon Hammonds ("defendant") appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery with a dangerous weapon. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in (1) denying defendant's motion to suppress statements made to police officers while he was involuntarily committed; and (2) ordering that defendant pay $50 in restitution. We find no error in part, vacate in part, and remand.

*604I. Background

The following evidence was presented by the State at trial: At approximately 8:30 p.m. on 10 December 2012, Stephanie Gaddy was walking to her car in a Wal-Mart parking…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API