Legal Opinion

Moran v. Burbine

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 10, 1986No. 84-1485PublishedCited by 2,847 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

After being informed of his rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966), and after executing a series of written waivers, respondent confessed to the murder of a young woman. At no point during the course of the interrogation, which occurred prior to arraignment, did he request an attorney. While he was in police custody, his sister attempted to retain a lawyer to represent him. The attorney telephoned the police station and received assurances that respondent would not be questioned further until the next day. In fact, the interrogation session that yielded the inculpatory…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,847 opinions

  1. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

2,842 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API