Legal Opinion

In re Kersey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 15, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The respondent, George E. Kersey, appeals from an order of a single justice suspending him from the practice of law for three months and requiring him to purge an outstanding contempt order before reinstatement. We affirm.

We have reviewed the entire record before the Board of Bar Overseers (board) and the single justice. An outline of the essential facts is as follows. In May, 1991, the respondent’s wife filed a complaint for divorce in the Vermont Family Court. During the course of the divorce and related proceedings, the court adjudicated the respondent in contempt on three occasions for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. In the Matter of FinnertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. In re DoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. In re KennedyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. In re RingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re KerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. In re GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. In re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. In Re KerseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. In re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API