Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Finnerty

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 15, 1994PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

This is a bar discipline case. Following a hearing before the Board of Bar Overseers pursuant to Supreme Judicial Court Rule 4:01, § 8, as amended, 415 Mass. 1304 (1993), the hearing committee made the following findings. The respondent, Thomas E. Finnerty, was admitted to the Massachusetts bar on November 17, 1960. He established his own practice as a professional corporation in 1980 and has continued since then as the sole practitioner of the corporation. In 1984, the professional corporation was changed to a Subchapter S corporation. In the spring or summer of 1983, Harold Brown, a real…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of AlterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. In re KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. In the Matter of PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. In the Matter of NeitlichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In re FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. In re KerlinskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  3. In re BrauerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. In re the Discipline of Two AttorneysMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. In re BarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API