Legal Opinion

In re Kersey

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 2006No. 04-BG-469Published

1Per curiam

The Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”) recommended that the respondent, George E. Kersey, a member of our Bar, be disbarred in the District of Columbia as reciprocal discipline from a New Hampshire proceeding. Kersey filed an exception to the Board’s Report and Recommendation arguing that the discipline imposed by the Supreme Court of New Hampshire was improper and based on incorrect findings of law and fact. Despite Kersey’s claims, we adopt the recommendation of the Board.

I

The respondent is a patent attorney who was admitted to the Bar of the District of Columbia by motion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. In Re ColeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Matter of VelasquezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. In Re HoldmannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. In re KerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API