Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Chemical Supply Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 1968PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
Was the defendant corporation causally negligent by reason of its failure to deliver toluol in containers completely painted a bright red color pursuant to sec. 168.11 (2), Stats?
At all times material to this case, sec. 168.11 (2), Stats., read as follows:
“(2) No person shall deliver, place, receive or store any gasoline (or a like product of petroleum which has a flash point of less than 110° F. when tested in the Tagliabue closed cup tester) in any visible container . . . unless such visible container is completley painted a bright red color and the name of the product contained therein…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bentzler v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Colla v. MandellaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Schilling v. StockelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Ernst v. GreenwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Wadhams Oil Co. v. Tracy, State Supervisor of Inspectors of Illuminating OilsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- National Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Board of School Directors v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Sprecher v. Weston's Bar, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Milwaukee v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Milwaukee Federation of Teachers, Local No. 252 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.