Colla v. Mandella
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWingeRt, J.
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Viewing the facts presented on the motion in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, we cannot say that there is no issue of fact for trial which if resolved in favor of the plaintiff would entitle her to judgment.
1. The decision of this court on the previous appeal, that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable for consideration by the jury, established the existence of a jury issue relative to the negligence of Mandella in leaving his truck as he did. Colla v. Mandella, 271 Wis. 145, 72 N. W. (2d) 755.
2. If Mandella was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Waube v. WarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Klassa v. Milwaukee Gas Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- Morgan v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- A. E. Investment Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.