Legal Opinion

Sumitomo Bank v. Taurus Developers, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 1986No. D003296PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

The Sumitomo Bank of California (Bank or Sumitomo) appeals from a judgment of dismissal after demurrers were sustained without leave to amend on its causes of action against Taurus Developers, Inc. We affirm the portion of the judgment dismissing the causes of action for breach of contract, bad faith waste, fraud, and violations of the Business and Professions Code, since they are barred under the full credit bid rule; and for strict liability since it is not applicable to a lender in a real estate transaction who purchases a defective construction project. We reverse the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. GEM Developers v. Hallcraft Homes of San Diego, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Appalachian Insurance v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Evans v. California Trailer Court, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Commonwealth Mortgage Assurance Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API