State v. Wiley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Appellant was found guilty of possession of a Schedule I controlled substance by the Hennepin County District Court, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 152.09, subd. 1(2) (1984). The prosecution arose out of the seizure at appellant’s residence, pursuant to a search warrant, of two boxes containing loose, suspected marijuana. Appellant moved to suppress this evidence on the ground that the affidavit filed in support of the search warrant did not establish probable cause to search the residence. Appellant also moved for disclosure of the identity of the informant who provided…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Massachusetts v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. ZanterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Bernadyn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.