Davis v. Brown
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
Ordinarily, in construing a deed it is the duty of the court to ascertain the intent of the grantor or grantors as embodied in the entire instrument, and each and every part thereof must be given effect if this can be done by any fair or reasonable interpretation. Featherston v. Merrimon, 148 N.C. 199, 61 S.E. 675 ; Triplett v. Williams, 149 N.C. 394, 63 S.E. 79, 24 L.R.A. (N.S.) 514; In re Dixon, 156 N.C. 26, 72 S.E. 71; Acker v. Pridgen, 158 N.C. 337, 74 S.E. 335; Midgett v. Meekins, 160 N.C. 42, 75 S.E. 728; Seawell v. Hall, 185 N.C. 80, 116 S.E. 189; Boyd v. Campbell, 192 N.C. 398, 135…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Bryant v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Bryant v. ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Cullens v. . CullensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Boyd v. . CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Griffin v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Franklin v. FaulknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Rouse v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Tremblay v. AycockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Russell v. RussellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991