Legal Opinion

Davis v. Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 10, 1954No. 316PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

Ordinarily, in construing a deed it is the duty of the court to ascertain the intent of the grantor or grantors as embodied in the entire instrument, and each and every part thereof must be given effect if this can be done by any fair or reasonable interpretation. Featherston v. Merrimon, 148 N.C. 199, 61 S.E. 675 ; Triplett v. Williams, 149 N.C. 394, 63 S.E. 79, 24 L.R.A. (N.S.) 514; In re Dixon, 156 N.C. 26, 72 S.E. 71; Acker v. Pridgen, 158 N.C. 337, 74 S.E. 335; Midgett v. Meekins, 160 N.C. 42, 75 S.E. 728; Seawell v. Hall, 185 N.C. 80, 116 S.E. 189; Boyd v. Campbell, 192 N.C. 398, 135…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Bryant v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Bryant v. ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Cullens v. . CullensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Boyd v. . CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. SpringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Franklin v. FaulknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Rouse v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Tremblay v. AycockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Russell v. RussellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API