Legal Opinion

Tremblay v. Aycock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1965No. 535PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMooRE, J.

Determination of the ownership of the locus in quo requires interpretation of the provisions of the deed of 5 January 1921 from C. E. Lee to Lemon Lee.

We pass over, for the present, the paragraph immediately following the description. According to the naming, granting and habendum clauses the conveyance was “to Lemon Lee and the heirs of his body." This provision, standing alone, vested in Lemon Lee an estate tail, which was converted to a fee simple by statute, G.S. 41-1. Pittman v. Stanley, 231 N.C. 327, 56 S.E. 2d 657; Bank v. Snow, 221 N.C. 14, 18 S.E. 2d 711; Whitley v. Arenson, 219 N.C.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Reid v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Willis v. Mutual Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Whitley v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Cullens v. . CullensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Boyd v. . CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API